Double review: Claude writes, Claude and Codex check
A new workflow: two independent reviews for every piece of code, with Opus making the final call. Found bugs that had been around for years.
I’m doing major changes in our analytics engines right now. A hard-mode task, so to speak.
Right away: the core reasoning on it I trusted only to Opus. By the way, besides the refactoring it found a couple of really serious flaws that had been dragging on for years. We can thank KMP for that.
But that’s not the point. The point is the double review I recently added to my workflow.
Claude writes the code, then a review runs from both Claude and Codex. Then Opus looks at the two opinions and decides what goes back for rework and what can stay.
It’s turning out really interesting so far. I’ll keep watching.
Sources are in gor-mobile.